The Sin of Misceganation Part II
Microsoft Word document [45.5 KB]

The Sin of Miscegenation, Part Two:

Precursor of Racial Genocide


By Dan Gayman


While millions of Americans focus on the an unsettled world in Central Asia, the growing influence of China, and the resurgence of Russian imperialism, a silent killer is stalking the streets of America, working furiously, like a Trojan horse inside the city, to bring America into the dustbin of history.  The silent killer that no one wishes to confront except in hushed tones, and then only with trusted friends, is the irreversible sin of race mixing. This insidious sin stalks the cities, towns, villages, and even the countryside of America as the “dumbed down” Anglo-Saxon fathers of this land give license to their fair daughters to link up with blacks and mix their DNA forever. It used to be that only black football, basketball, or baseball stars could claim white girlfriends, which was just as wrong.  Now, however, they do not even need a job to get a white girl.  


The sin of interracial mixing and marriage is proliferating beyond the wildest imaginations. The long-established moral guardrails that once prohibited this interracial mixing have long since disappeared as the fathers, preachers, educators, legislators, and judges have, for the past half century, opened the floodgates to the sin of miscegenation. Long considered the absolute moral compass of America, the Bible now has been declared irrelevant and archaic, no longer the voice of God’s absolute truth.


Families with long-standing, established Anglo-Saxon heritages have sacrificed and squandered their priceless racial heritage in the name of tolerance upon the altar of human ignorance. The blood of every race is poisoned by the sin of miscegenation as God’s original design for racial integrity within every distinct and separate race is destroyed. 


The tidal wave of Mexican nationals and other third world aliens who have crossed our southern border, a large percentage of them young males with high testosterone levels, have filled America’s interstate highways, spilling into small towns looking for work of any kind. And work is not all they are looking for. Separated from their families, they are looking for female companionship and are finding it among the lower socio-economic classes, sometimes even into the middle and upper middle classes. What are they leaving behind but the evidence of their presence in an explosion of brown babies left in the arms of white welfare moms.  


It is remarkable that only in recent decades have theologians and lay Christians attempted to use the Bible to support the sin of interracial marriage. For centuries, the separation of the races was so well established that people accepted segregation as simply a fact of human behavior.  The existence of representatives from all the major racial types in the 21st Century is vindication of and confirmation that racial segregation in marriage has been practiced from antiquity to the present.  All the clearly separate and distinct racial types would not continue to be present if segregation and intolerance of race mixing had not been the long established pattern.


For centuries, Christians honored and respected the Bible as the absolute and inerrant truth of God revealed to His children on earth (Deut. 29:29). Professing Christians in America, regardless of their church affiliation, lived believing that the Bible endorsed and supported racial segregation in marriage, the family, and the church setting. In fact, using the Bible to support interracial marriage is something that was almost unheard of before 1950. Only when the floodgates of racial integration opened in the unfolding decades of the 20th Century was the sin of miscegenation defended from Scripture.  A well-established historical record supports racial segregation in marriage, the family, and in worship not only in the United States of America, but also throughout Western European Culture. There is no neutral ground for the subject of interracial marriage, nor can it be said that exceptions can be made for interracial mixing while the prevailing rule forbids such practice. Interracial marriage must be declared wrong in all circumstances. Miscegenation is a violation of God and nature.   Miscegenation is always morally wrong and represents an assault upon God’s original design for every distinct and separate race.


Important Reflections to Consider


It is necessary that we open the covers of the Bible and inquire about the subject of race. All of us have been influenced to varying degrees about this subject from a variety of stimuli to which our minds have been subjected. Therefore, it is necessary to underscore some basic premises regarding a biblical worldview as it pertains to this subject. Most people have established their belief about race on premises that may not be accurate.  Consider some premises that are operating in the minds of most Christians in today:


Premise #1:


Many professing Christians believe that Adam and Eve are the progenitors of all existing races on the earth.  If you believe that all races are descended from Adam and Eve, with one common ancestral point of origin, the case for interracial marriage is already closed.  However, if Adam and Eve are not the common progenitors of all races, but instead every race was created separately and distinct from the other, interracial marriage would be an assault upon God’s original design for every race.  This study proceeds on the basis that Adam and Eve are the parents of one singular race alone.  This premise is more explicitly established in our book Adam and Eve:  Parents of One or Many Races? It is not possible to rewrite in this venue all the many arguments used to support the above thesis in the book.  Suffice it to say that the biblical, historical, anthropological, and other proofs that establish Adam and Eve as being the progenitors of the white (Caucasian) race are irrefutable. Many have tried and failed. After all, that Adam and Eve were the progenitors of just one race was the prevailing view among the majority of Christians until the advent of Evolutionary Humanism in the mid-1800s.


Let me encourage you, reader, to study the above-mentioned book along with numerous others that support this thesis.  Other titles that you may wish to review include the following: Did All Races Come from Adam by Lawrence Blanchard; The Origin of Mankind by Ambrose Fleming; Adam and the Adamite by Richard Bentley; Types of Mankind by J. C. Nott and George R. Gliddon; Anthropology by Dr. Paul Topinard; Not of One Blood by Charles A. Wiseman; and Preadamites by Alexander Winchell.


Premise #2:


The Bible is written to, for, and about the human race, of which Adam and Eve are the parents. This thesis rejects this premise and proceeds on the premise that the Bible is written generally to, for, and about Adam kind (one and the same with the Caucasian race), and more particularly is the record of one family or branch of the Adamic race: Israel, the people descended from Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and the twelve tribes of Israel and their descendants. Genesis 5:1-2 establishes in precise language that the Bible is the record of Adam kind: “This is the book of the generations of Adam.  In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.”


That the Bible is the record of Adam kind alone: “When the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.  For the LORD’s portion is his people; Jacob (Israel) is the lot of his inheritance” (Deut. 32:8-9). When God distributed the landmass of the earth, He separated the children of Adam to their respective allotted areas and made one qualifying statement.  He set the boundaries of this land distribution “according to the number of the children of Israel” for a good reason.


In the unfolding ages, the seed of Adam was to be greatly out-numbered by one particular branch of that race, Israel:  “He shall cause them that come of Jacob to take root:  Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit” (Isaiah 27:6). The prophetic announcement upon Rebekah, wife of Isaac and mother of Jacob-Israel, was that she would become “the mother of thousands of millions” and her children would inherit and possess the strategic gateways of the earth. The offspring of Jacob-Israel would become one of the predominate peoples to occupy the earth.


It is significant that the regions in the Far East, lands historically occupied by the Oriental races, together with south Sahara Africa, historically have been the lands of various Black tribes or races.  At the dawn of history the Creator allotted to the various races their respective portions of the earth.  Since the Bible was written to, for, and about Adam kind, Israel in particular, the Bible references only these people whose ancestry is connected to this race.  


Premise #3:


A majority of professing Christians believes that from Noah’s three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth, all existing races of the earth descended. This assumption rests upon the premise that all existing races of the earth descended from Noah and his sons.  This thesis rejects this assumption and asserts that all three sons of Noah—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—were Adam kind (Caucasian) stock.  No other races descended from them. To believe that all races descended from one man, Adam, or from Noah and his three sons following the Genesis Flood is a flagrant disregard of biological, genetic, biblical, and historical evidence and acknowledges the veracity of the foundational precepts of Evolutionary Humanism.


This thesis further proceeds on the premise that the Genesis Flood was a global event and that representatives of all races were aboard the ark. They all departed the ark and began reproducing themselves in their allotted regions of the earth. Again, this premise rests on an overwhelming body of biblical, historical, archeological, and anthropological evidence. This body of body of biblical and extra-biblical literature is voluminous and refutes any arguments used to defend a regional flood. The evidence available to support this premise is monumental and would require similar space to detail it.


Premise #4:


Genesis chapter one provides detailed data for all the distinctive and separate races of the earth. This thesis cannot be supported from the narrative of Genesis one.  Indeed, God created life forms, including the distinct and separate races; they are included in the narrative of Genesis one. What needs challenging is that Genesis supplies detailed and particular information about the creation of other races.  Further, we understand clearly that God created all life forms in the ocean; yet only the whale is mentioned in particular in Genesis 1 (Gen. 1:21). Thus, we conclude that all the life forms—fowl, fish, animals, and races, are included in the Genesis narrative; but none of them is particularized.  The several distinct and separate races are in the narrative of Genesis 1:25 under the term “living creature.” These individual races preceded the creation of Adam man (Genesis 1:26-27).  The first physical body for Adam kind, the man Adam, was formed on the eighth day (Genesis 2:7). Yet, Genesis 2:5 clearly indicates there was not a man to cultivate the soil. This problem was resolved in Genesis 2:7 when God placed an implanted spirit within a physical body formed from the dust of the ground, and the first man (Aw-dawm man) was made a “living soul.”  Man became conscious of his own being: “And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.”  Surely it is clear that this man had to be Adam, the federal head of the race of Adam kind. 


Premise #5:


Skin color is the only distinguishing difference between the races.  This thesis rejects this premise and asserts that there are biological, mental, psychological, skeletal and physiological differences, including brain weight, size, and texture discrepancies, eye, nose, and facial distinctions, and blood type variances, that mark God’s original design for each separate race. Our marvelous Creator gave each race a distinct set of characteristics that make them unique. God then declared all life forms, including the various races, to be very good (Genesis 1:31). Every race bears the Creator’s original design. Each race, with its own unique set of characteristics, was created to fill a particular role in God’s created world.


Premise #6:


God’s plan for all races is one and the same since they all descended from Adam and Eve. We reject this thesis and believe that God entered a covenant with Adam man, the federal head of the Adamic race (Genesis 2:15-17). This conditional covenant of works with its associated laws placed Adam man under God’s authority and responsible for executing obedience to the covenant and administering God’s law. Adam man was given lordship over the earth and was told to be fruitful, multiply, and exercise dominion over the earth and of all things therein.  He was given liberty to freely engage in exercising free will and liberty with one exception: he was not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. 


In the exercise of his free will, Adam man could choose to obey or disobey His Creator. However, to disobey would mean forfeiture of conditional immortality and the resulting punishment:  the curse of death.  Disobedience would further result in the loss of dominion, and Adam man would then be obligated to struggle to achieve lordship and dominion of the earth. The liability for sin, i.e., transgression of God’s law (I John 3;4; Romans 3:20; 7:7) rests upon Adam and his posterity—not the other individually created races. The non-Adamite races were never placed under law and suffer no liability before God for sin.  Never having been placed under covenant and law, they are not guilty for Adam’s transgression.  They suffer in the same sense that everyone under a particular headship suffers when the person in charge comes under judgment. Adam’s sin resulted in the whole creation groaning and travailing under the weight of the broken world that followed his disobedience. As a consequence of Adam’s sin, the whole creation travails in pain: “For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now” (Rom. 8:22).


The non-Adamic races know God. Each of them worships the Creator in their unique manner.  Representatives of each of the separately created races will be present in God’s restored Kingdom. Scripture declares, “all people will walk every one in the name of his god, and we will walk in the name of the LORD our God for ever and ever” (Micah 4:5).  The manner in which the non-Adamite races approach God differs greatly. The non-Adamic races were to be blessed as they yielded to Adam man’s lordship.   (Question:  what race provides medical aid and comfort to the Negroid race in Africa suffering from the epidemics of AIDS, Ebola, and other plagues?

None of the non-Adamic races is under covenant or law; they are not liable for sin. “Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression” (Romans 4:15).  “(For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law)” (Romans 5:13). Death continues to reign over all the other races, even though they “…had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression…” (Romans 5:14).  Moreover, Scripture tells us in Romans 3:19 “…that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law…” Moreover, Galatians 4:4-5 declares this:  “…God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.”  No redemption was required for those not in servitude and bondage to sin. Adam and his posterity were under liability for sin; it is this race that is in urgent need of redemption.   


Establishing Biblical Guardrails


The above premises are the biblical guardrails in any discussion of racial truth. Many Bible students and theologians are of the opinion that the foregoing premises placed a check on theologians of previous generations to challenge the intolerance of the general population of any given country toward interracial marriage. To remove these guardrails is to invite the ultimate downfall and even genocide of one or more of the distinctive races which God created. Because of the racial premises long held by the Christian community, the Western European peoples have consistently resisted the sin of interracial marriage.


We must clearly understand that throughout history, the separate and distinct races have remained essentially segregated—and this in spite of the fact that long established patterns of interracial mixing between the Arab slave traders and their enslaved African women existed (as well as other examples that could be cited). When the males from another race occupy foreign soil without their own wives, interracial mixing often results—even though such practices are considered morally unlawful and usually illegal.  In the Far East, interracial mixing between indigenous Japanese and other races is absolutely unacceptable; the same is true in China to this very day. 

The 2010 Pew Research Center Report (U.S. Census Bureau’s 2010 American Community Survey) found that 15.1% of new marriages in the U.S. were between spouses of a different race. The 2008 Pew Research Survey found that more than a third of all adults (35%) say they have a family member married to someone of another race. The fact that America is so racially diverse can only mean a sharp rise in the growing number of interracially mixed couples.  Consider that as late as 1935 and 1937, anti-miscegenation bills were introduced into sessions of the Washington State Legislature. In February of 1935, King County Representative Dorian Todd proposed House Bill No. 301:  “A prohibition on marriages of persons of Caucasian ancestry to ‘Negroes, Orientals, Malays, and persons of Eastern European extraction’.” While this, along with a second attempt, failed to halt the sin of miscegenation, it demonstrates the widespread opposition to this sin that persisted in America.


Only in recent history have theologians begun to mount a biblical defense in favor of interracial marriage, and this in the face of a multicultural, racially diverse nation. Pastors and theologians are under severe pressure to build inclusive congregations in the midst of a racially diverse nation such as now exists. It is difficult to find theological evidence prior to 1900 that defends interracial mixing and marriage.


The irreversible and horrific impact of interracial marriage has yet to be acknowledged by 21st Century clergymen in the United States and elsewhere. The long-term, irreversible impact of interracial mixing will have enormous social, economic, and genetic implications for our future. If you truly want to see the future racial face of America, simply travel to Brazil, where you will find a blending of several races into one brown hue.  And, this is happening in a country that once had anti-miscegenation laws in every state in the union except eight; only one state west of the Mississippi River (Washington) did not forbid interracial marriage. 


Remnant Christians must waive all other considerations in their efforts to inform their children and youth of the absolute imperative of maintaining and preserving their racial integrity. This battle cannot be won when Caucasian sons and daughters are allowed to attend interracially mixed churches, public elementary and high schools, playgrounds, and other venues where friendship with other races is fostered. In Part III of this thesis, the biblical case study against interracial mixing and marriage will proceed.








Scroll to the bottom of the home page to learn about upcoming events and to find new updates!

Contact Us:

Church of Israel

3161 S. 2275 Rd.
Schell City, MO 64783



Phone: 417-432-3119






Print Print | Sitemap
© Church of Israel